data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2b38/c2b381605267992b10cb30ba772e5443c96141be" alt=""
The film's opening is similar to many films from its era in which a strange event affects the characters and brings doubt into a seemingly perfect world. That world probably bordered on the one inhabited by Leave it to Beaver before this event, but it will surely never be primetime TV in the wake of such a catastrophe. In this case the "event" is the presence of a radioactive cloud that is encountered by a man named Scott Carey (played by Grant Williams). Though most would say Scott is a victim of circumstance, some might say that this all happens because he was too lazy to go get his own damn beer...were he any kind of a gentleman, we'd be talking about The Amazing Shrinking Woman and Randy Stuart (which I just learned is a) the name of the woman who played Scott's wife, Louise; and b) a woman) would be our lead.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f92b6/f92b608e701d54202c5e9ed2c5b561fd425cb478" alt=""
Throughout the first half of the film, Scott Carey is a sad individual that represents many of the problems that have plagued humanity's brief existence. He grieves his appearance and becomes impatient with others, because they can't possibly understand the issues he is dealing with. This instills a hostile attitude toward others - who are at the same time going out of their way to help him - and believes that he cannot be a functional part of the world due to his disability. I posed the issue of his laziness saving his wife the same fate as a joke earlier, but I really am concerned about this version of Scott. If he were the one caring for her as she suffered this fate, would he have dealt with things with any grace or sympathy, or would he have cut and run as soon as he had the chance? His behaviors lead me to believe the latter.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93ee5/93ee5c9b6daa8167264c5b2d3eedb018d3338ad0" alt=""
It is in this purgatory that Scott begins to change his thinking. Surviving an encounter with the resident spider becomes a far bigger concern than any of his previous earthly desires, and - with no way to get back up the stairs and Louise moving out to avoid her memories - the prospect of this being a permanent hell becomes far too real to Scott. As he realizes the challenges that face him, he grows more and more accepting of his place in the great big world. This might be due to the sense of accomplishment that comes with surviving what is essentially a post-apocalyptic wasteland, but it might also mean that Scott is believing in something bigger than himself and the challenges around him.
As the short film (har har!) barrels to an anticlimax (given an extra dose of theology by a tacked on inner monologue by Arnold that fits with the pulp sci-fi films of the '50s) the viewer begins to care deeply for Scott in his quest to survive. His misplaced desires and poor choices fade away as we witness him work to survive, and his willingness to tread forward and face his limitations is infectious. The tentacles of the spider and a surprise flood suddenly become effective to the viewer, because we've seen Scott's past faults break apart with our own eyes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d84/05d844d92254d6140f2a9e5fb61b045365508bee" alt=""
Anyone who says otherwise is telling a tall tale. (Har har!)
3 comments:
Great post. I love this film and agree that it's far deeper and more potent than a mere '50s monster movie (although quite a few '50s monster movies are also quite deep and potent). I've been meaning to read the novel and rewatch this film for some time now. thanks for the reminder!
+JMJ+
I haven't seen this one, but now I want to!
There's a good article about this in Paracinema magazine issue 8, comparing it to Attack of the 50 Foot Woman and positing that both were masculine fears of a progressive age--that women would gain power while men lost it. In the films this is metaphorically represented by physical changes in stature.
Post a Comment